Re: Fusion-io ioDrive - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jeffrey Baker
Subject Re: Fusion-io ioDrive
Date
Msg-id fd145f7d0807011836y48496bd4m469f575615ae74aa@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fusion-io ioDrive  ("Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fusion-io ioDrive  ("Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Andrej Ricnik-Bay
<andrej.groups@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/07/2008, Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Red Hat and its clones.  The other problem is the 80GB model is too
>>  small to hold my entire DB, Although it could be used as a tablespace
>>  for some critical tables.  But hey, it's fast.
> And when/if it dies, please give us a rough guestimate of its
> life-span in terms of read/write cycles.  Sounds exciting, though!

Yeah.  The manufacturer rates it for 5 years in constant use.  I
remain skeptical.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fusion-io ioDrive
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Fusion-io ioDrive