Re: typedef struct LogicalDecodingContext - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: typedef struct LogicalDecodingContext
Date
Msg-id fc5cf5fb-b1c6-c874-0907-1a459781bbd9@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: typedef struct LogicalDecodingContext  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 02.03.23 03:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> writes:
>> Apparently, not all C99 compilers can be assumed to work using the
>> strict C99 rules.
> 
> While googling this issue I came across a statement that clang currently
> defaults to C17 rules.  Even relatively old compilers might default to
> C11.  But considering how long we held on to C89, I doubt we'll want
> to move the project minimum to C11 for some years yet.

We need to wait until we de-support Visual Studio older then 2019. 
(Current minimum is 2015 (changed from 2013 for PG16).)





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: typedef struct LogicalDecodingContext
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication