Re: Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 31/12/22 23:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp@gmail.com> writes:
>> This is in reference to BUG #5705 and corresponding todo item: Fix
>> /contrib/btree_gist's implementation of inet indexing
>> I am not able to repro this issue.
> You didn't test it right: the complaint is about the btree_gist
> extension, not the in-core inet opclass, which didn't even
> exist when this bug was filed.  AFAICS btree_gist is still
> broken.  See
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/201010112055.o9BKtZf7011251%40wwwmaster.postgresql.org
>
> The commit message for f23a5630e may also be informative:
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=f23a5630e
>
>             regards, tom lane

Hi,

Sorry I missed this. Thanks for the pointer, I will check this again 
properly.

-- 
Regards,
Ankit Kumar Pandey