Re: Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro
Date
Msg-id 1045732.1672509751@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro  (Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro  (Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp@gmail.com> writes:
> This is in reference to BUG #5705 and corresponding todo item: Fix
> /contrib/btree_gist's implementation of inet indexing

> I am not able to repro this issue.

You didn't test it right: the complaint is about the btree_gist
extension, not the in-core inet opclass, which didn't even
exist when this bug was filed.  AFAICS btree_gist is still
broken.  See

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/201010112055.o9BKtZf7011251%40wwwmaster.postgresql.org

The commit message for f23a5630e may also be informative:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=f23a5630e

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample
Next
From: Ankit Kumar Pandey
Date:
Subject: Re: Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro