On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 08:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Right, that seems like a good goal. Thinking about this a little
> more,
> it's only holding off *cancel* interrupts, not *all* interrupts, so
> presumably you can still terminate the backend in this state. That's
> not so bad, and it's not clear how we could do any better. So I
> withdraw my previous complaint about this point.
Further thoughts on this? I don't feel comfortable making this change
without a stronger endorsement.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
