> Most odd, what I've been hearing out of JPUG is a pretty much 'undecided', with
> some requesting no change, and some not caring either way ...
Yes.
As I wrote, the pronunciation is not a problem in Japan,
so we can't find any (strong) reason to change the name right now.
We (JPUG board members) have no consensus.
Following is just my opinion.
If we (the PostgreSQL community) decide to change the name
to re-brand 'Postgres' in the world for the marketing reason,
I don't have objection to that.
But I think the word 'PostgreSQL (these 10 charactors)', has already have
good brand-image and large market-share in Japan.
2007/9/27, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Wednesday, September 26, 2007 16:09:59 +0800 Shashank Tripathi
> <shashank.tripathi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I am not sure on what this observation is based? Japan as a market
> > would be very pleased if the name was Postgres, as this is how it gets
> > pronounced most often in my experience -- in the entire CJK market.
>
> Most odd, what I've been hearing out of JPUG is a pretty much 'undecided', with
> some requesting no change, and some not caring either way ...
>
> - ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQFG+ufX4QvfyHIvDvMRAoHOAKDgTRbdpiF9/yRmmiH4kbUGheF7ZgCfSfc+
> cZJOcBiCk4QhNIbkumMgP+Y=
> =mAXY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <snaga@snaga.org>
