On 24.03.22 06:17, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> The comment and errmsg_plural don't seem to be consistent. When the
> code was added by c4f2a0458d, it had only singular form and already
> had the comment. After that 8032d76b5 turned it to errmsg_plural
> ignoring the comment. It seems like a thinko of 8032d76b5.
I have removed the comment.