Re: unlogged sequences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Subject | Re: unlogged sequences |
Date | |
Msg-id | e9d61c9b-7613-27de-3d52-d4dda3f22dc1@enterprisedb.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: unlogged sequences (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>) |
Responses |
Re: unlogged sequences
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Here is an updated patch that now also includes SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED support. So this version addresses all known issues and open problems. On 28.02.22 10:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > rebased patch, no functional changes > > On 11.02.22 10:12, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 25.06.19 20:37, Andres Freund wrote: >>> I.e. I think it'd be better if we just added a fork argument to >>> fill_seq_with_data(), and then do something like >>> >>> smgrcreate(srel, INIT_FORKNUM, false); >>> log_smgrcreate(&rel->rd_node, INIT_FORKNUM); >>> fill_seq_with_data(rel, tuple, INIT_FORKNUM); >>> >>> and add a FlushBuffer() to the end of fill_seq_with_data() if writing >>> INIT_FORKNUM. The if (RelationNeedsWAL(rel)) would need an || forkNum == >>> INIT_FORKNUM. >> >> Now that logical replication of sequences is nearing completion, I >> figured it would be suitable to dust off this old discussion on >> unlogged sequences, mainly so that sequences attached to unlogged >> tables can be excluded from replication. >> >> Attached is a new patch that incorporates the above suggestions, with >> some slight refactoring. The only thing I didn't/couldn't do was to >> call FlushBuffers(), since that is not an exported function. So this >> still calls FlushRelationBuffers(), which was previously not liked. >> Ideas welcome. >> >> I have also re-tested the crash reported by Michael Paquier in the old >> discussion and added test cases that catch them. >> >> The rest of the patch is just documentation, DDL support, client >> support, etc. >> >> What is not done yet is support for ALTER SEQUENCE ... SET >> LOGGED/UNLOGGED. This is a bit of a problem because: >> >> 1. The new behavior is that a serial/identity sequence of a new >> unlogged table is now also unlogged. >> 2. There is also a new restriction that changing a table to logged is >> not allowed if it is linked to an unlogged sequence. (This is IMO >> similar to the existing restriction on linking mixed logged/unlogged >> tables via foreign keys.) >> 3. Thus, currently, you can't create an unlogged table with a >> serial/identity column and then change it to logged. This is >> reflected in some of the test changes I had to make in alter_table.sql >> to work around this. These should eventually go away. >> >> Interestingly, there is grammar support for ALTER SEQUENCE ... SET >> LOGGED/UNLOGGED because there is this: >> >> | ALTER SEQUENCE qualified_name alter_table_cmds >> { >> AlterTableStmt *n = makeNode(AlterTableStmt); >> n->relation = $3; >> n->cmds = $4; >> n->objtype = OBJECT_SEQUENCE; >> n->missing_ok = false; >> $$ = (Node *)n; >> } >> >> But it is rejected later in tablecmds.c. In fact, it appears that >> this piece of grammar is currently useless because there are no >> alter_table_cmds that actually work for sequences. (This used to be >> different because things like OWNER TO also went through here.) >> >> I tried to make tablecmds.c handle sequences as well, but that became >> messy. So I'm thinking about making ALTER SEQUENCE ... SET >> LOGGED/UNLOGGED an entirely separate code path and rip out the above >> grammar, but that needs some further pondering. >> >> But all that is a bit of a separate effort, so in the meantime some >> review of the changes in and around fill_seq_with_data() would be useful.
Attachment
pgsql-hackers by date: