Re: Cafeconf 2007 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Guido Barosio
Subject Re: Cafeconf 2007
Date
Msg-id f7f6b4c70709280741l82fade4hf2a70a1b88cd27d2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cafeconf 2007  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Thanks Josh,

   Regarding the "Default install", my idea is to explain the big gap
between both engines from a fresh  and default install. This gap will
"stdout" things more clearly rather than just saying "this engine is
fecking far better", letting the students/public arrive to a clear
understanding in order to make better decitions in the future.

  For instance:

 "CREATE TABLE (a serial, b varchar);"

  Teacher: "You pupil, can you let me know the differences between the
two implementations?"

  So far, that's the idea, to introduce a SWOT analysis based on this mindset.

thanks for the docs!

On 9/28/07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Guido,
>
> Heh, now you see the uselessness of the PostgreSQL-Advocacy list.  If
> it's not about Postgres vs. PostgreSQL vs. MySQL, you don't get an answer.
>
> So, here's some useful information:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.83
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.84
>
> Also, I'm concerned ... what do you mean by "default install"?
>
> --Josh
>


--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido.barosio@globant.com

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Gavin M. Roy"
Date:
Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.