Re: progress report for ANALYZE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuro Yamada
Subject Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Date
Msg-id f7c2d0a3-acc7-1a27-7d88-d970bced80c3@nttcom.co.jp_1
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: progress report for ANALYZE  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2020/01/24 23:44, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 6:47 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 2020-Jan-22, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
>>> P.S.
>>> Next up is progress reporting for query execution?!
>>
>> Actually, I think it's ALTER TABLE.
> 
> +1.  Existing infrastructure might be enough to cover ALTER TABLE's
> needs, whereas we will very likely need to build entirely different
> infrastructure for tracking the progress for SQL query execution.

Yeah, I agree.
I will create a little POC patch after reading tablecmds.c and alter.c to
investigate how to report progress. :)

Regards,
Tatsuro Yamada






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?