Re: progress report for ANALYZE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqHx8fOTbJu1pqwTmtqcH=i9ex5R-Sg+hF0weW+ZScSCng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: progress report for ANALYZE  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: progress report for ANALYZE  (Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 6:47 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2020-Jan-22, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
> > P.S.
> > Next up is progress reporting for query execution?!
>
> Actually, I think it's ALTER TABLE.

+1.  Existing infrastructure might be enough to cover ALTER TABLE's
needs, whereas we will very likely need to build entirely different
infrastructure for tracking the progress for SQL query execution.

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code