Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY
Date
Msg-id f3723966-022a-fb74-06f4-3801f4fb7c1b@postgresfriends.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/24/20 8:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I was checking some loose ends in SQL conformance, when I noticed: We
> support GRANT role ... GRANTED BY CURRENT_USER, but we don't support
> CURRENT_ROLE in that place, even though in PostgreSQL they are
> equivalent.  Here is a trivial patch to add that.


The only thing that isn't dead-obvious about this patch is the commit
message says "[PATCH 1/2]".  What is in the other part?

Assuming that's just a remnant of development, this LGTM.
-- 
Vik Fearing



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel copy
Next
From: "Inoue, Hiroshi"
Date:
Subject: Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup