Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY
Date
Msg-id e9571f93-d04f-8357-7191-cc44df4a3a9a@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
Responses Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-06-24 10:12, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 6/24/20 8:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I was checking some loose ends in SQL conformance, when I noticed: We
>> support GRANT role ... GRANTED BY CURRENT_USER, but we don't support
>> CURRENT_ROLE in that place, even though in PostgreSQL they are
>> equivalent.  Here is a trivial patch to add that.
> 
> 
> The only thing that isn't dead-obvious about this patch is the commit
> message says "[PATCH 1/2]".  What is in the other part?

Hehe.  The second patch is some in-progress work to add the GRANTED BY 
clause to the regular GRANT command.  More on that perhaps at a later date.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: should libpq also require TLSv1.2 by default?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: should libpq also require TLSv1.2 by default?