Re: [pgsql-es-fomento] Pootle server request - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Emanuel Calvo Franco
Subject Re: [pgsql-es-fomento] Pootle server request
Date
Msg-id f205bb120812101105l68af4060wddc31e768d427746@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-es-fomento] Pootle server request  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-es-fomento] Pootle server request  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-www
2008/12/10 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:
> Guido Barosio escribió:
>
>> We are learning, committing our time and effort, surfing problems and
>> overall helping things get done.  If this is a comlete waste of time
>> please let me know and I will gladly let others waste their time.
>
> I thought what we were going to do was install it for ourselves.
> Somebody even said they had a server somewhere on Argentina where it
> could live.  I didn't understand the turn of events where it was decided
> to ask to put it under postgresql.org.  As far as I understand, the
> service would have been already running by now.
>

Yeap. Server is ok to run Pootle. I just waiting for the server admin to upload
this (Mariano).

One of the disadvantages to put pootle on postgresql.org is that will
be more dificultly to admin instead having the server 'at hand'

At least, i´d rather have an extra server than being short on one. :P


> --
> Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>



--      Emanuel Calvo Franco
Syscope Postgresql Consultant    ArPUG / AOSUG Member


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-es-fomento] Pootle server request
Next
From: Diego Gil
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-es-fomento] Pootle server request