On 05.09.24 14:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 07.08.24 22:54, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
>> Here are some fixes based on outstanding feedback (some old some new).
>
> I have studied your patches v39-0001 through v39-0004, which correspond
> to what had been reverted plus the new empty range check plus various
> minor fixes. This looks good to me now, so I propose to go ahead with
> that.
>
> Btw., in your 0003 you point out that this prevents using the WITHOUT
> OVERLAPS functionality for non-range types. But I think this could be
> accomplished by adding an "is empty" callback as a support function or
> something like that. I'm not suggesting to do that here, but it might
> be worth leaving a comment about that possibility.
I have committed these, as explained here.
I look forward to an updated patch set from you to review the "FOR
PORTION OF" patches next.
