Re: Autovacuum on Partitioned Tables - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron
Subject Re: Autovacuum on Partitioned Tables
Date
Msg-id ecf63c8a-8eca-3152-9c62-3574cb7a2098@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autovacuum on Partitioned Tables  (Ryan Ruenroeng <rruenroeng@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum on Partitioned Tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On 10/31/22 17:26, Ryan Ruenroeng wrote:
Hello there!

There is a statement in the Postgres Docs: "Partitioned tables are not processed by autovacuum."

What does the above statement mean?
Does autovacuum not process both the parent and the child tables in a partition relationship?

Partitioned (aka parent) tables are "virtual".  There's nothing to vacuum are analyze.


What is the definition of a partitioned table?

I have a table with 50+ million rows that gets data added to/wiped from it every 90 days. We are planning to break this table into a few thousand partitions.

1. That's a lot of partitions.  Older (like v12) query optimizers don't do a great job handle that many partitions.
2. Be careful what you partition on.  (We added "partition_date" to PKs so as to partition by date, even though the "real" PK is a synthetic key; it was a query performance disaster in Pg 12.)

More partitions will likely be added in the future, but we don't have plans to delete any of the partitions. Will we need to manually track the statistics of these partitions and manually vacuum the tables or will autovacuum help to manage them?

Autovacuum will handle it.

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bryn Llewellyn
Date:
Subject: Re: CASE CLOSED... Re: "peer" authentication: cannot make "pg_ident.conf" work as I believe that the doc says that it should
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: CASE CLOSED... Re: "peer" authentication: cannot make "pg_ident.conf" work as I believe that the doc says that it should