Re: [HACKERS] Passing values to a dynamic background worker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Passing values to a dynamic background worker
Date
Msg-id eb73c20f-3093-93d7-74de-76494fb8d516@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Passing values to a dynamic background worker  (Keith Fiske <keith@omniti.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Passing values to a dynamic background worker  (Keith Fiske <keith@omniti.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/17/17 16:19, Keith Fiske wrote:
> I've reached a roadblock in that bgw_main_arg can only accept a single
> argument that must be passed by value for a dynamic bgw. I already
> worked around this for passing the database name to the my existing use
> of a bgw with doing partition maintenance (pass a simple integer to use
> as an index array value). But I'm not sure how to do this for passing
> multiple values in.

You can also store this kind of information in a table.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and synchronous replication
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code