On 09.09.2019 22:47, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:32 PM Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
On 08.09.2019 22:32, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:44 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
I'm going to push both if no objections.
So, pushed!
Two years ago there was a similar patch for this issue:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1499c9d0-075a-3014-d2aa-ba59121b3728%40postgrespro.ru
Sorry that I looked at this thread too late.
I see, thanks.
You patch seems a bit less cumbersome thanks to using GISTDistance
struct. You don't have to introduce separate array with null flags.
But it's harder too keep index_store_float8_orderby_distances() used
by both GiST and SP-GiST.
What do you think? You can rebase your patch can propose that as refactoring.
Rebased patch with refactoring is attached.
During this rebase I found that SP-GiST code has similar problems with NULLs.
All SP-GiST functions do not check SK_ISNULL flag of ordering ScanKeys, and
that leads to segfaults. In the following test, index is searched with
non-NULL key first and then with NULL key, that leads to a crash:
CREATE TABLE t AS SELECT point(x, y) p
FROM generate_series(0, 100) x, generate_series(0, 100) y;
CREATE INDEX ON t USING spgist (p);
-- crash
SELECT (SELECT p FROM t ORDER BY p <-> pt LIMIT 1)
FROM (VALUES (point '1,2'), (NULL)) pts(pt);
After adding SK_ISNULL checks and starting to produce NULL distances, we need to
store NULL flags for distance somewhere. Existing singleton flag for the whole
SPGistSearchItem is not sufficient anymore.
So, I introduced structure IndexOrderByDistance and used it everywhere in the
GiST and SP-GiST code instead of raw double distances.
SP-GiST order-by-distance code can be further refactored so that user functions
do not have to worry about SK_ISNULL checks.
--
