On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:32 PM Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On 08.09.2019 22:32, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:44 PM Alexander Korotkov
> > <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> >> I'm going to push both if no objections.
> > So, pushed!
>
> Two years ago there was a similar patch for this issue:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1499c9d0-075a-3014-d2aa-ba59121b3728%40postgrespro.ru
>
> Sorry that I looked at this thread too late.
I see, thanks.
You patch seems a bit less cumbersome thanks to using GISTDistance
struct. You don't have to introduce separate array with null flags.
But it's harder too keep index_store_float8_orderby_distances() used
by both GiST and SP-GiST.
What do you think? You can rebase your patch can propose that as refactoring.
------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
