On 3/22/17 3:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/22/17 15:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> If changing WAL sizes catches on, I do think we should keep thinking
>> about a new format for a future release,
>
> I think that means that I'm skeptical about changing the default size
> right now.
I think if we don't change the default size it's very unlikely I would
use alternate WAL segment sizes or recommend that anyone else does, at
least in v10.
I simply don't think it would get the level of testing required to be
production worthy and I doubt that most tool writers would be quick to
add support for a feature that very few people (if any) use.
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net
