Re: Version Numbering - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From greg@turnstep.com
Subject Re: Version Numbering
Date
Msg-id e88040a2aa63b78f0ae0ba396dbfab4c@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Version Numbering  (Jason Hihn <jhihn@paytimepayroll.com>)
Responses Re: Version Numbering  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> As we know, most hindrances to OSS adoption are psychological. For that
> reason, do you think that maybe 7.4, if it contains native windows support,
> should be called 8.0?

No. This would never fly. Postgres has a reputation of sensible version
numbering. I think it would have to be something more major to the
underlying codebase than native Windows support before we jumped up
to 8.0.

Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200212130903

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE9+ejevJuQZxSWSsgRAvEaAKDv0OuZsBU8JTftibU0RO11UAIN1ACfcdwV
z3I5ESCM/8ZX94RyugrVDk0=
=f1RM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering