Le 01/07/2024 à 10:07, Daniel Gustafsson a écrit :
>> On 28 Jun 2024, at 09:06, Philippe BEAUDOIN <phb.emaj@free.fr> wrote:
>> So just looking in public repo covers probably less than 1% of the code. However, this may give a first idea,
especialyif a feature use is already detected.
> Searching for anything on Github is essentially a dead end since it reports so
> many duplicates in forks etc. That being said, I did a lot of searching and
> browsing to find users [0], but came up empty (apart from forks which already
> maintain their own copy). A more targeted search is the Debian Code search
> which at the time of removal (and well before then) showed zero occurrences of
> adminpack functions in any packaged software, and no extensions which had
> adminpack as a dependency. While not an exhaustive search by any means, it
> does provide a good hint.
>
> Since you list no other extensions using adminpack to support keeping it, I
> assume you also didn't find any when searching?
I just said that there are much much more code in private repos (so not
analyzable) than in the public ones.
>
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson
>
> [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/B07CC211-DE35-4AC5-BD4E-0C6466700B06%40yesql.se
