Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
Date
Msg-id e71053ef-ebe1-c055-51c8-71fd201c382a@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 11/2/2017 9:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
The SCRAM discussion is spread across two threads mainly with hundreds
of emails, which may discourage even the bravest. Here are links to
the important documentation:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/auth-methods.html#auth-password

so that says...  ... [scram-sha-256] is the most secure of the currently provided methods, but it is not supported by older client libraries....

whats the state of the more popular bindings now?   jdbc, python native, etc ?

-- 
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint and recovering process use too much memory
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption