Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1yiNq_S6-iULaMS-ciHmxBWc4TzpNQG2gCRsGgb7zYkaQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:58 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
On 11/2/2017 9:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
The SCRAM discussion is spread across two threads mainly with hundreds
of emails, which may discourage even the bravest. Here are links to
the important documentation:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/auth-methods.html#auth-password

so that says...  ... [scram-sha-256] is the most secure of the currently provided methods, but it is not supported by older client libraries....

whats the state of the more popular bindings now?   jdbc, python native, etc ?


What is 'python native'?  psycopg works as long you update your libpq.  
 
Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] SSL and Encryption