Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id e686a4c1-97f2-02e0-7e58-96bc66489806@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 17.09.22 11:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14.09.22 23:09, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Here is a patch that addresses this.
>>
>> My intent was to present archive_command as the built-in archive library,
>> but I can see how this might cause confusion, so this change seems
>> reasonable to me.
> 
> While working on this, I noticed that in master this conflicts with 
> commit 3cabe45a819f8a2a282d9d57e45f259c84e97c3f.  I have posted a 
> message in that thread looking for a resolution.

I have received clarification there, so I went ahead with this patch 
here after some adjustments in master around that other patch.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema