Re: archive modules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: archive modules
Date
Msg-id 03e80ca4-81ec-8b58-ac54-40b25f56254f@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive modules  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: archive modules
List pgsql-hackers
On 14.09.22 23:09, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Here is a patch that addresses this.
> 
> My intent was to present archive_command as the built-in archive library,
> but I can see how this might cause confusion, so this change seems
> reasonable to me.

While working on this, I noticed that in master this conflicts with 
commit 3cabe45a819f8a2a282d9d57e45f259c84e97c3f.  I have posted a 
message in that thread looking for a resolution.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: remove more archiving overhead
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to address creation of PgStat* contexts with null parent context