On 04.02.26 16:08, Bryan Green wrote:
> On 1/20/2026 2:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 08.01.26 15:57, Bryan Green wrote:
>>> I agree with the above changes and have implemented them, including the
>>> correction to the cutoff version. But, before sharing the patch with
>>> those changes I think we should discuss 1) should we short-circuit
>>> C/POSIX and not ever call gettext in that case,
>>
>> You had written that you had submitted a patch to gettext to handle that
>> there. Has that gotten anywhere?
>>
>>> 2) should we try to
>>> convert "ISO" to Windows legacy format.
>>
>> I don't know. We can just tell users to set their locale in the right
>> format.
> Peter,
> I have attached the patch with the changes you suggested/requested. The
> patch was added to gnulib in December. The latest release of gnu
> gettext (1.0) does include the patch. Yes, they jumped from 0.26 to 1.0.
The newly released gettext 1.0 is now available in MSYS2, so I tested
this again. The new gettext indeed makes a significant performance
improvement compared to my test results with earlier gettext versions
(about 10x faster).
This is all without any PostgreSQL patch.
But when I apply your patch, it actually makes things worse (by about
25%). This is incomprehensible to me, but it's very reproducible. I'm
not sure how to proceed now.
