Re: List traffic - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: List traffic
Date
Msg-id e3e99c85032a806a93a73ea8e5f3b6ab@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: List traffic  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: List traffic
Re: List traffic
Re: List traffic
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> There is no reason why advocacy can't happen on general. Theoretically
> www could be on hackers (although I do see the point of a separate
> list).

I don't feel as strong about -advocacy being removed, but we certainly 
can fold in -sql and -admin. Would anyone argue against rolling those 
two (sql and admin) into -general as a first step?

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201005141009
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkvtWbgACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjfAQCg0s9GxUIKnxHjbAWd2XOWxYpk
OZMAni62Fpj/PPTE9/qFUNw08une4YgT
=OyI0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: List traffic
Next
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle