Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Relaxin
Subject Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?
Date
Msg-id e1hn6m$25ln$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?  (<ebcorder@rockwellcollins.com>)
List pgsql-novice
"Alan Hodgson" <ahodgson@simkin.ca> wrote in message
news:200604101804.03763@hal.medialogik.com...
> On April 9, 2006 07:02 am, "Relaxin" <me@yourhouse.com> wrote:
>
> I think if you try both products, under any kind of concurrent read/write
> load, especially if you use MySQL in a non-default manner that actually
> guarantees safe data (ie. with InnoDB or at least by turning fsync on),
> you will find that PostgreSQL compares quite favourably speed-wise, while
> at the same time being just a much nicer product to work with.
>
> This is of course just my opinion.  I invite you to try the product before
> dismissing it based on what some other people have to say.
>

Thank you Alan for your response.

What I need ( and other novice)  what are all of the parameters for and how
would you set them up properly, so that we can also see the performance
benefits of PG?

I need this information for PG for Windows...I'm sure others need it for
Linux.

Thanks



pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: "Daniel McBrearty"
Date:
Subject: Re: advice on setting up schema sought
Next
From: Sean McCune
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB?