Re: Help in avoiding a query 'Warm-Up' period/shared buffer cache - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Qingqing Zhou
Subject Re: Help in avoiding a query 'Warm-Up' period/shared buffer cache
Date
Msg-id dpk922$slo$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Help in avoiding a query 'Warm-Up' period/shared buffer cache  (Mark Liberman <mliberman@mixedsignals.com>)
Responses Re: Help in avoiding a query 'Warm-Up' period/shared buffer cache  (Mark Liberman <mliberman@mixedsignals.com>)
List pgsql-performance
"Mark Liberman" <mliberman@mixedsignals.com> wrote
>
> First run, after a night of inactivity:
>
>                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on 1min_events_file_id_begin_idx
> (cost=0.00..37.85 rows=3670 width=0) (actual time=313.468..313.468
> rows=11082
> loops=1)
>                           Index Cond: (file_id = 137271)
> Total runtime: 313.643 ms
>
> Second run, after that:
>
>                     ->  Bitmap Index Scan on 1min_events_file_id_begin_idx
> (cost=0.00..37.85 rows=3670 width=0) (actual time=2.106..2.106 rows=11082
> loops=1)
>                           Index Cond: (file_id = 137271)
> Total runtime: 2.276 ms

It is clear that the first query takes longer time because of the IO time of
index 1min_events_file_id_begin_idx (see 313.468 vs. 2.106). I am afraid
currently there is no easy solution for this situation, unless you could
predicate which part of relation/index your query will use, then you can
preload or "warm-up" cache for it.

Regards,
Qingqing




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Frank Wiles
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving Inner Join Performance
Next
From: Patrick Hatcher
Date:
Subject: Slow query. Any way to speed up?