Re: [GENERAL] Installing module for 9.6, not 9.2, on Centos? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Installing module for 9.6, not 9.2, on Centos?
Date
Msg-id df364c34-b872-678a-37f4-8f97187b3a3f@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Installing module for 9.6, not 9.2, on Centos?  (Ken Tanzer <ken.tanzer@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 5/23/2017 4:54 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
But the install still goes to 9.2:

PATH=/usr/local/pgsql96/bin/:$PATH make USE_PGXS=1 install                  |
/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/pgsql-9.2/share/contrib'


earlier you said something about /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin ...   is it that, or is it /usr/local/pgsql96/bin ?

does

    /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_config

output a whole pile of directory assignments that make sense ?

or does

    /usr/local/pgsql96/bin/pg_config

do that?



-- 
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Installing module for 9.6, not 9.2, on Centos?
Next
From: Igor Korot
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Have just libpg installer