Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history
Date
Msg-id de8f2b8a-969b-455e-ee2d-0e2d144ff3ff@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history
List pgsql-docs
On 6/22/23 9:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>> "With multiple decades of development behind it, PostgreSQL.."
> 
> +1.  It sure seems silly trying to automate changing this.

+1. With the proposed language, we can revisit it once it gets to 
"centuries."

Jonathan


Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: streaming replication depends on matching glibc versions / LOCALE sort order