Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history
Date
Msg-id ZJZZ7Pl0MMa8VGOp@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history
List pgsql-docs
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:01:45PM -0400, Jonathan Katz wrote:
> On 6/22/23 9:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> > > "With multiple decades of development behind it, PostgreSQL.."
> > 
> > +1.  It sure seems silly trying to automate changing this.
> 
> +1. With the proposed language, we can revisit it once it gets to
> "centuries."

Applied patch is "With decades of development".

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: bad choice of the word in sentence
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history