On 20/04/17 23:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/20/17 10:19, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Hmm well since this only affects the synchronization of table
>> states/names, I guess we could just simply do that before we create the
>> slot as there is no expectancy of consistency between slot and the table
>> list snapshot.
>
> I suppose that wouldn't hurt.
>
> Prior to the table sync patch, a missing target relation would just show
> up as an error later on in the logs. So having the error sooner
> actually seems like a good change.
>
Very simple patch to make.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers