Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Date
Msg-id dcc563d11003021334nc2e9505ued5d248562e70d1e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics  (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics  (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com> wrote:
> With 24 drives it'll probably be the controller that is the limiting factor
> of bandwidth. Our HP SAN controller with 28 15K drives delivers 170MB/s at
> maximum with raid 0 and about 155MB/s with raid 1+0. So I'd go for the 10K
> drives and put the saved money towards the controller (or maybe more than
> one controller).

That's horrifically bad numbers for that many drives.  I can get those
numbers for write performance on a RAID-6 on our office server.  I
wonder what's making your SAN setup so slow?

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Francisco Reyes
Date:
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Next
From: Francisco Reyes
Date:
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics