Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10911161252h4c0e0036pd9d30bde86e7fccf@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote:
> Dave Crooke wrote:
>> My reply about server failure was shwoing what could go wrong at the
>> server level assuming a first-class, properly run data center, with
>> fully redundant power, including a server with dual power supplies on
>> separate cords fed by separate UPS'es etc. ....
> Never had a motherboard short out either eh?  China makes really GOOD
> electrolytic caps these days (I can show you several SERVER CLASS boards
> that were on conditioned power and popped 'em, rendering the board dead
> instantly.)
>
> Murphy is a bastard.

You know about the whole capacitor caper from a few years back, where
this one plant was making corrosive electrolyte and a huge number of
capacitor suppliers were buying from them.  Mobos from that era are
terrible.  Caps that expand and burst after anywhere from a few months
to a few years of use.  ugh.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Next
From: Kenneth Marshall
Date:
Subject: Re: Unexpected sequential scan on an indexed column