Re: Poor overall performance unless regular VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Poor overall performance unless regular VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10907142152j6a3e288r89e3d731544a5099@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Poor overall performance unless regular VACUUM FULL  (Wayne Conrad <wayne@databill.com>)
Responses Re: Poor overall performance unless regular VACUUM FULL
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Wayne Conrad<wayne@databill.com> wrote:
> Howdy.  Some months back, when advised on one of these lists that it
> should not be necessary to issue VACUUM FULL/REINDEX DATABASE, we quit
> this nightly "maintenance" practice.  We've been very happy to not
> have to do that, since it locked the database all night.  Since then,
> however, our database performance has decreased.  The decrease took a
> few weeks to become noticable; perhaps six weeks to become awful.
SNIP
> What options do I have for restoring performance other than VACUUM
> FULL/REINDEX DATABASE?

Just wondering, which pgsql version, and also, do you have autovacuum turned on?

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance comparison between Postgres and Greenplum
Next
From: David Wilson
Date:
Subject: Re: Poor overall performance unless regular VACUUM FULL