Re: H2 database - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: H2 database
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10901060127q5c15d12dsf68b64f1d1b360a9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to H2 database  (Pascal Cohen <pcohen@wimba.com>)
Responses Re: H2 database  ("Emanuel Calvo Franco" <postgres.arg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Pascal Cohen <pcohen@wimba.com> wrote:
> Hello and best wishes for this new year.
> I have a question concerning the H2 DB.
> http://www.h2database.com/html/main.html
> I've read (on their site) that they got better perfs than PG or MySQL in any
> case (embedded in a Java application and even as a standalone server).
> Tests seem a bit "light" with a single thread benchmarking the DB but the
> results seem anyway interesting.

So, in other words, it's not really that interesting.  :)  How well a
db runs with a single thread really doesn't mean a lot unless you're
only using it for single user embedded or batch processing.  I'd like
to see a simple pgbench style (i.e. mixed reads and writes with
transactions) benchmark with 5, 10, 50, 100 users, etc...  That would
tell you something interesting.  Since they haven't published a
benchmark with > 1 user, I'm willing to bet that the performance with
> 1 users is not so good, and gets worse as you add users.

http://tweakers.net/reviews/649/8/database-test-sun-ultrasparc-t1-vs-punt-amd-opteron-pagina-8.html

Now that is an interesting benchmark.  Notice how MySQL is a good
20-30% faster with one user?  More importantly see what it does with
many users, and how it behaves as the number of users increases.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Gurjeet Singh"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: failed to find conversion function from "unknown" to text
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: failed to find conversion function from "unknown" to text