Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10810100650j2d2d8fcsfac67ae0e808d0f8@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences  (Bart Grantham <bg@logicworks.net>)
Responses Re: Opteron vs. Xeon performance differences  ("postgres Emanuel CALVO FRANCO" <postgres.arg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Bart Grantham <bg@logicworks.net> wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been beaten into the ground, but my team and I
> couldn't find much conclusive study or posts on this issue.  To make a long
> story short: we're experiencing Xeons as 50% slower than Opterons, even when
> the Xeon has twice as much cache and a slight clock speed advantage.

I'm not sure what causes this issue either, although I suspect it's
the inter-CPU / CPU to memory communication speeds that make the
difference.  It seems that as the number of CPUs increase, the opteron
lead increases over the xeon.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: GROUP BY does not follow SQL standard
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about hstore