Re: Rename Contributor to Significant Contributor - Mailing list pgsql-www

On 11/24/25 3:52 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Jonathan S. Katz
>> * The fixtures edits will be purely for testing purposes; those changes will
>> need to be added into the "Contributor types" section of the admin panel.
> 
> Ah ok. I can see them there, but lack permission to edit.

Ack; when you're ready to push, I can make those changes in the admin 
(or if simpler, I can also push / change at the same time).

>>> https://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/
> 
> What I forgot to mention is a small detail that is perhaps
> interesting: I'm changing
> 
> These are the fine people that make PostgreSQL what it is today!
> 
> to
> 
> These are the fine people that made PostgreSQL what it is today!
>                                   ^
> 
> Good/bad?

This is a fun one :) I liked "make" because it's in present tense, and 
is true - active contributors continue to make PostgreSQL!

>>> * I added a "PostgreSQL" to the (in-page) title so "PostgreSQL
>>>     Contributor Profiles" sounds better than a mundane "Contributor
>>>     Profiles" listing
>>
>> This is fine; I think it's also OK to add it to the title block, since it'll
>> appear in search results with that too, but I'm not wed to that opinion.
> 
> The current <title> is already "PostgreSQL: Contributor Profiles", so
> duplicating that is a bit weird. (But having header title and in-page
> title deviate is also weird...)

Ah OK, I'm fine with it as you originally suggested. My search results 
were hiding the "PostgreSQL" title away.

>>> * I moved the "how to suggest" section to the end so the list isn't
>>>     cluttered with too much text at the top
>>
>> I'm not sure what the reasoning was to have it originally up top - maybe it
>> was to make it easier to find that info, especially because the page is
>> fairly long. I'd be OK with keeping it up top - it's not too much to scroll.
> 
> IIRC originally there was only some "mail webmaster" bit at the bottom.
> 
> I think that page has this information:
> 
> 1. who are the people on the list
> 2. how do I add someone
> 
> And currently 2 is before 1, which seems weird to me at least.

I'm not strongly opinionated on this one, so I'm fine with moving it to 
the bottom. I think your reasoning makes sense.

Thanks,

Jonathan