Hi Julius Tuskenis,
Many thanks for helping me. These are good solutions. But I have some
doubts
Look below
On Oct 10, 11:06 am, jul...@nsoft.lt (Julius Tuskenis) wrote:
> I would suggest you 2 solutions:
> 1. to use a function to edit these fields. That way you will be sure
> that you will not forget to update both tables.
> 2. use a trigger on master table. If I understand you - the history
> table could be filled using trigger, when data in master table changes.
> That way you could change only master table in your application.
>
I think having triggers would bring performance down. So instead can
we have single
sql update statement to update all four fields of two tables? Just a
crazy idea.
> Good luck!
>
Thanks for the wish.
These wishes needed to implement smart solution to above problem :)
