Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the bestcolumn name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the bestcolumn name
Date
Msg-id d988ed2e-c532-d7e6-3f3e-6c2cc3d824f2@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the bestcolumn name  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the best column name  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 4/13/17 08:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> We could go with "ste" perhaps, or break the convention of 3-character
>> prefixes and go with "stae".
> We have a bunch of > 3-character prefixes already: amop*, amproc*, 
> enum*, cast*. But I think I nevertheless like "ste" better.

"stx" perhaps?

I would also be in favor of changing it to something other than "sta".

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs extension upgrades
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade