Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the best column name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the best column name
Date
Msg-id 6471.1492100257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the bestcolumn name  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the bestcolumn name  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 4/13/17 08:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> We have a bunch of > 3-character prefixes already: amop*, amproc*, 
>> enum*, cast*. But I think I nevertheless like "ste" better.

> "stx" perhaps?

> I would also be in favor of changing it to something other than "sta".

"stx" sounds pretty good to me --- it seems like e.g. "stxkind" is
more visibly distinct from "stakind" than "stekind" would be.

Any objections out there?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Undefined psql variables