Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date
Msg-id d9167104-fd56-937e-9b3a-112ff035a09d@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/19/20 11:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Let's just rip it out and be done.  If anyone is ever
> motivated to make it work per spec, they can resurrect
> whatever seems useful from the git history.

+1

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?