Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date
Msg-id 20201119161716.GA14861@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:15:33AM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 11/19/20 11:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Let's just rip it out and be done.  If anyone is ever
> > motivated to make it work per spec, they can resurrect
> > whatever seems useful from the git history.
> 
> +1

+1

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Skip ExecCheckRTPerms in CTAS with no data