On 2/10/26 11:52, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 12:26:36PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> +1 to apply this change only to the master branch. Patch attached.
>
> It looks like something we should have a test for, at least..
+1 for a test.
> + /*
> + *
> + * If both signal files are present, standby signal file takes precedence.
> + * If neither is present then we won't enter archive recovery.
> + */
>
> This comment's format is incorrect.
Other than the comment the patch looks good overall.
Reluctantly I have to agree to not back patch this. I'm not sure how
this change would break existing recovery processes but experience tells
me that it probably would.
Instead -- I wonder if we could add a warning in the back branches?
Regards,
-David
