Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Grant Johnson
Subject Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key
Date
Msg-id d89c7bde-2314-4f00-8dd3-c4d2c13bff44@email.android.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key  (Julien Cigar <jcigar@ulb.ac.be>)
Responses Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key
Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key
List pgsql-performance
My experience has been that the performance advantage for numeric keys is primarily an Oracle thing. However, Oracle is popular enough for people to assume that it applies to databases in general.

Julien Cigar <jcigar@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
The biggest difference in performance between text and integer keys is usually down to whether you're inserting in order or not. Inserting in order is tons faster regardless of the type, since it keeps the index unfragmented and doesn't cause page splits.

On 02/04/2013 22:52, Anne Rosset wrote:

Hi,

I have read a lot of different information about the benefits of using numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key(small size). And what I am gathering is that for performance there is no more great advantage.

It seems like now RDBMS in general, postgres in particular handles pretty well joins on text indexes.

Did I understand correctly?

Thanks,

Anne



--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Julien Cigar
Date:
Subject: Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key
Next
From: Florent Guillaume
Date:
Subject: Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key