Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Claudio Freire
Subject Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key
Date
Msg-id CAGTBQpYNO-mLNsWWqPaLUX0B_KSg0aA+=AuUEcN_dDOCHoC5fw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key  (Grant Johnson <grant@amadensor.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Grant Johnson <grant@amadensor.com> wrote:
> My experience has been that the performance advantage for numeric keys is
> primarily an Oracle thing. However, Oracle is popular enough for people to
> assume that it applies to databases in general.

The advantage in PG also exists, only tied to size. It's not really
whether it's numeric or not, but whether values are big or not. Int or
other primitive types tend to be far faster to join because of their
fixed, small size. If you have a varchar, and if you have big values
from time to time, joining becomes heavy because the index is huge (it
has to contain the values).


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Florent Guillaume
Date:
Subject: Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key
Next
From: Dan Kogan
Date:
Subject: High CPU usage / load average after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.04