On 10/3/16 3:18 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am feeling consensus on removing source of PL from \dt+. There is
> partial consensus on saving this field (renamed) for C and internal
> language. I am not sure about consensus about \sf enhancing.
FWIW, I'm completely in favor of ditching PL source code. I'm neutral on
C and internal.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
