Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Showing parallel status in \df+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRDi1n2_TYmuSXM=M6xgobz_BnWOMwrdc9zmho=9fa_5qA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Showing parallel status in \df+  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Remove "Source Code" column from \df+ ?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Hi

2016-10-08 23:46 GMT+02:00 Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>:
On 10/3/16 3:18 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
I am feeling consensus on removing source of PL from \dt+. There is
partial consensus on saving this field (renamed) for C and internal
language. I am not sure about consensus about \sf enhancing.

 FWIW, I'm completely in favor of ditching PL source code. I'm neutral on C and internal.

here is a patch

Regards

Pavel
 
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumdb -f and -j options (was Question / requests.)
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: Switch to unnamed POSIX semaphores as our preferred sema code?